What we cover
The directory exists for restaurants that an attentive eater might choose to visit deliberately — for the food, the room, the company, or the occasion. That includes:
- —
Independent restaurants in Pattaya, Jomtien, Naklua, Wongamat, Pratumnak, and Bang Saray
Owner-operated places, neighbourhood institutions, family kitchens, and serious chef-led restaurants across every cuisine and price tier.
- —
Hotel restaurants when they earn it
Many of the city's best dining rooms sit inside five-star hotels. We review them when they're worth the trip on their own merits, not as conveniences for guests.
- —
Locally beloved Thai chains, where notable
MK Suki, Coca, After You, certain regional restaurants — included when they hold genuine local affection and aren't simply tourist conveniences.
What we will not review
Equally important: the restaurants we deliberately exclude. Their absence is intentional, not an oversight.
- ×
International fast-food chains
McDonald's, KFC, Burger King, Starbucks, and similar global chains. Not because they're bad, but because writing about them serves no reader. They are what they are wherever you find them.
- ×
Bars and clubs without a serious food program
The directory is about restaurants — rooms whose primary purpose is feeding you well. Pure drinking establishments belong elsewhere.
- ×
Pure tourist-trap photo restaurants
Restaurants whose appeal is built around Instagram backdrops, prop dining experiences, or spectacle untethered from the food itself.
- ×
Restaurants that have closed
We remove entries within 48 hours of confirming a closure. Lingering closed listings make a directory worthless; we'd rather have fewer entries that are accurate.
- ×
Restaurants we have not personally researched
If a restaurant is in the directory, we have at minimum cross-referenced its current operation across multiple recent sources. We do not list places we cannot verify exist and operate.
No restaurant has paid to be on this site, ranked higher, or written about more positively. There is no path to that arrangement. Any attempt to purchase coverage is met with a polite no and a permanent note in our records.
How we handle compromised situations
Editorial credibility depends on disclosure when something might compromise it. Our policies:
- °
Comped meals
If a restaurant comps a meal — intentionally or otherwise — that visit is not used as the basis for the review. We return on our own dime before publishing.
- °
Friendships and acquaintances
Pattaya is a small city; we know operators. Where a personal relationship exists, we either disclose it within the review or hand the restaurant to a different reviewer.
- °
Affiliate links
The site uses none. No restaurant booking commissions, no kickbacks from delivery platforms, no sponsored upgrades. The only revenue model is reader trust.
- °
Press events and openings
We attend them sometimes for context, never as the basis for an editorial review. The first published assessment of any new restaurant is based on at least one anonymous, paid visit.
How we handle errors
Errors happen. Restaurants change ownership, hours shift, menus get reworked. Our standing commitment is:
- °
Acknowledge fast
Submitted corrections are read within 24 hours and acted on within 48, unless verification depth requires longer.
- °
Annotate, don't disappear
When we change a published opinion based on new information, we say so within the entry. We don't quietly rewrite the past.
- °
Accept honest disagreement
Our judgment isn't the only valid one. When readers tell us we're wrong, we listen and reconsider — even if the public conclusion stays the same.